Re: Trying to reach consensus for the proposed modules
- From: Pat Suwalski <pat suwalski net>
- To: Desktop Devel <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Trying to reach consensus for the proposed modules
- Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 18:30:17 -0500
Elijah Newren wrote:
gedit 2.13.x also depends on g-p-e, for the new python plugins (like the
Snippets Plugin ).
It requires at least the gtksourceview module, and perhaps the
gnome-print bindings (I'm not sure).
The previous consensus and agreement was that desktop modules could
depend upon python bindings found in the bindings release set.
gnome-python-extras isn't part of that set. As pointed out in
Murray's email, it's not suitable for that set either. So we need to
determine what we want to do and reach consensus on this point as
well. A variety of options exist:
I'll bring a conservative point of view forward: binding inclusion
aside, does this make gedit any faster? Does it make it slower? Slower
is not acceptable, as gedit has been feeling slower and slower every
Maybe it's time for a gedit-lite that bears much more resemblance to
Windows notepad than where gedit is going.
] [Thread Prev