Re: Trying to reach consensus for the proposed modules
- From: Emmanuele Bassi <ebassi gmail com>
- To: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Trying to reach consensus for the proposed modules
- Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 00:45:32 +0100
On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 18:30 -0500, Pat Suwalski wrote:
> > Murray's email, it's not suitable for that set either. So we need to
> > determine what we want to do and reach consensus on this point as
> > well. A variety of options exist:
> I'll bring a conservative point of view forward: binding inclusion
> aside, does this make gedit any faster?
Gedit is a lot faster in 2.13 than 2.12. Have you tried it recently?
> Does it make it slower? Slower
> is not acceptable, as gedit has been feeling slower and slower every
> Maybe it's time for a gedit-lite that bears much more resemblance to
> Windows notepad than where gedit is going.
Notepad is a poor excuse for a text *viewer*, with inane limitations
that have survived the ages. Even on win32 I use wordpad instead of
notepad. I wouldn't use it in a comparison with any software - even
with cat or emacs - as a form of respect for the other program.
Emmanuele Bassi - <ebassi gmail com>
] [Thread Prev