Re: Trying to reach consensus for the proposed modules

[Johan Svedberg <johan svedberg com>]

* Jan 12 00:05 Steve Frécinaux <nudrema gmail com>:
> Elijah Newren wrote:
>
> >The previous consensus and agreement was that desktop modules could
> >depend upon python bindings found in the bindings release set.
> >gnome-python-extras isn't part of that set.
>
> gedit's main widget is gtksourceview, which is not part of the pygtk
> bindings, so it would have been difficult not to depend on
> pygtksourceview
>
> >A variety of options exist:
> >[...]
>
> The possibility of creating a pygtksourceview package has been aborded.
> So, a possible (d) would be to create a ?gnome-python-base? which would
> be a subset of the current gnome-python-extra, with only bindings of
> blessed gnome libraries, leaving python-gnome-extra as its current
> status of ?experimental? package.

This seems like a sane solution to me.

--
Johan Svedberg, johan svedberg com, http://johan.svedberg.com/