Re: Tomboy in 2.16

["Iain *" <iaingnome gmail com>]

Two words...
Hell yeah.
(4 if you count the intro...15 if you count this bit)

On 4/21/06, Sriram Ramkrishna <sri aracnet com> wrote:
> So I'm seeing that everybody is up for Tomboy as part of the desktop.
> Yes?
>
> sri
>
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 01:03:38PM -0700, Alex Graveley wrote:
> >
> > Ya, that makes sense to me.  I'd like to move towards a pluggable
> > storage backend approach anyway, to support network storage or shared
> > notes, so an e-d-s backend could be an option as well.
> >
> > It seems like this issue shouldn't block Tomboy's inclusion though,
> > given that e.g. stickynotes doesn't store in e-d-s either, and I've not
> > received any requests for tomboy/e-d-s storage.  A future goal to unify
> > storage sounds good to me, once people start using Tomboy and Evolution
> > notes both.
> >
> > -Alex
> >
> > Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> > >On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 12:10 -0700, Alex Graveley wrote:
> > >>Two questions:
> > >>1) Can you explain the actual user-benefit to keeping Tomboy notes in
> > >>e-d-s?
> > >>
> > >the user can use whatever frontend, but the notes will be the same in
> > >all applications. Isn't that a benefit? No need to export/import/look
> > >for weird .dotdirs where the files were saved last time a specific
> > >frontend worked, etc, etc
> > >
> > >>2) Is moving Tomboy to use e-d-s going to be a requirement for inclusion
> > >>in Gnome?
> > >>
> > >I don't think so, but it would be a good thing
> > _______________________________________________
> > desktop-devel-list mailing list
> > desktop-devel-list gnome org
> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> desktop-devel-list mailing list
> desktop-devel-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
>