Re: Tomboy in 2.16
- From: Sriram Ramkrishna <sri aracnet com>
- To: Alex Graveley <alex beatniksoftware com>
- Cc: Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo gnome-db org>, Ross Burton <ross burtonini com>, Heikki Henriksen <heikkih gmail com>, desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Tomboy in 2.16
- Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 13:17:54 -0700
So I'm seeing that everybody is up for Tomboy as part of the desktop.
Yes?
sri
On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 01:03:38PM -0700, Alex Graveley wrote:
>
> Ya, that makes sense to me. I'd like to move towards a pluggable
> storage backend approach anyway, to support network storage or shared
> notes, so an e-d-s backend could be an option as well.
>
> It seems like this issue shouldn't block Tomboy's inclusion though,
> given that e.g. stickynotes doesn't store in e-d-s either, and I've not
> received any requests for tomboy/e-d-s storage. A future goal to unify
> storage sounds good to me, once people start using Tomboy and Evolution
> notes both.
>
> -Alex
>
> Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> >On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 12:10 -0700, Alex Graveley wrote:
> >>Two questions:
> >>1) Can you explain the actual user-benefit to keeping Tomboy notes in
> >>e-d-s?
> >>
> >the user can use whatever frontend, but the notes will be the same in
> >all applications. Isn't that a benefit? No need to export/import/look
> >for weird .dotdirs where the files were saved last time a specific
> >frontend worked, etc, etc
> >
> >>2) Is moving Tomboy to use e-d-s going to be a requirement for inclusion
> >>in Gnome?
> >>
> >I don't think so, but it would be a good thing
> _______________________________________________
> desktop-devel-list mailing list
> desktop-devel-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
--
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]