Re: Awesome new Mozilla roadmap!
- From: Vadim Plessky <plessky cnt ru>
- To: Carlos =?iso-8859-15?q?Perell=F3=20Mar=EDn?= <carlos gnome org>
- Cc: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Awesome new Mozilla roadmap!
- Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 00:12:31 +0400
On Monday 07 April 2003 23:57, Carlos Perelló Marín wrote:
| El lun, 07 de 04 de 2003 a las 21:39, Vadim Plessky escribió:
| [...]
|
| > And I can't take seriously statements that "Nautilus doesn't require Web
| > View/embedded browser component"
| > For the Heavens sake, *how* you can have modern Desktop without
| > integrated browser?..
|
| Hmmmm
|
| Please define "modern Desktop".
Windows+MS IE+Outlook.
KDE+Konqueror+KMail.
MacOS X+Safari (don't remember how they name e-mail client)
|
| Apple's MacOS is a really modern Desktop and does NOT integrate the
| browser inside their Finder (Finder is the MacOS Nautilus)
|
Safary would be released soon.
Missing browser was one of key MacOS weaknesses.
| I only know Microsoft Windows and KDE that integrate the browser inside
| their file manager. KDE does it because Windows have that feature, not
| because it's a "modern Desktop" (as you understand it).
KDE does it because KDE *can* deliver first-class browser.
AFAIK, it's the best browser on the market, if you count both
standards-compatibility and ability to render pages designed for MS IE.
On the other hand, Mozilla team can't deliver good browser even after 5 years
of work. So, it's rather stupid to discuss wether GNOME should have Galeon or
Epiphany.
If you want nice GNOME - than GNOME *should not* have Gecko-based browser!
|
| GNOME, MacOSX, KDE, Windows and others I don't know/remember are modern
| desktops but don't do the things the same way...
|
--
Best Regards,
Vadim Plessky
SVG Icons * BlueSphere Icons 0.3.0 released
http://svgicons.sourceforge.net
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]