Re: lock down features

[Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>]

On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 12:36:19PM +0000, Glynn Foster wrote:
> 
> While I'd love to see some of this stuff going into 2.2, I think I would
> prefer to concentrate getting the various GNOME preferences a little
> saner in terms of -
> 
> 	o GConf notification
> 	o sensitivity of widgets with non-writable configuration
> 	o handling --break-key, --recursive-unset etc..
> 	o making it easier to setup default preferences *
> 
> because I'm not sure if lock down really makes sense until we've got the
> other pieces of the puzzle solved, although I'd love to see this all
> happen.

I would say lockdown is totally orthogonal to above in most cases.
 
> * Havoc, you've felt the pain with the panel, right?

Yep. I'm not sure how we improve it without massive back incompat,
though. :-/

Havoc