Re: 2.0.1 bug situation, esp. wrt ZVT

Luis Villa wrote:

>On Mon, 2002-07-29 at 14:40, Havoc Pennington wrote:
>>Luis Villa <louie ximian com> writes: 
>>>No, no! zvt will be the community's solution for the 2.0.x series- it's
>>>just I'm afraid you've been the only person working on it, so when I saw
>>>no response from you I was afraid no solution was forthcoming. :) If you
>>>are going to continue to work on it, please don't let my
>>>misunderstandings of your situation stop you :) 
>>I should point out, in my opinion it is impossible to fix and
>>stabilize zvt in the timeframe we have for 2.0.2. Just won't make the
>>deadline. So if we're fixing zvt, it's either for 2.2, or it's going
>>to mean making large destabilizing changes post-2.0.2.
>FWIW, it's currently way more stable (even in the i18n branch) than vte-
>there hasn't been a crash reported against it in months against the
>trunk, and the i18n branch in it's current form has no reported crashes,
>despite a couple of weeks of testing in the ximian snaps. I have no idea
>how much further work hidetoshi needs to do, though.

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]