Re: libburn as a default backend?

From: Philippe Rouquier <bonfire-app wanadoo fr>
To: Fabian Greffrath <greffrath leat rub de>
Cc: brasero-list gnome org
Subject: Re: libburn as a default backend?
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2009 16:08:26 +0200

Le mardi 07 avril 2009 à 15:54 +0200, Fabian Greffrath a écrit :

Philippe Rouquier schrieb:
> Once those two things (CD TEXT for libburn and UDF support for libisofs) 
> are added I don't see any other case where libburn/libisofs could not 
> and won't be used.

I am really looking forward to a GNOME desktop without the requirement 
to install (a clone of) cdrecord! \o/

> And true, read cd functionality would be nice although brasero has 
> already some built in. (Second gunshot noise)

Sorry for the silly question, but why should Brasero want to *read* 
cd? Integrity checks?

Exactly or also get some information about the filesystem which is useful for DVD+RW for example as this type of discs doesn't work like CDs (they don't have the concept of track). In the future it could even help to replace the readcd/readom programs.

References:
- libburn as a default backend?
  - From: Fabian Greffrath
- Re: libburn as a default backend?
  - From: Mario
- Re: libburn as a default backend?
  - From: Philippe Rouquier
- Re: libburn as a default backend?
  - From: Fabian Greffrath

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]