Re: libburn as a default backend?

[Mario <mario danic gmail com>]

Hey Fabian,

 

while I am not a Brasero dev, I am libburnia project founder. From my understanding, Brasero tries to use libburnia libraries (libburn, libisofs) wherever possible (almost, I still have to shoot Phillipe for writing that small scsi "lib" :P=) if its been built with such support.

 

So what exactly is missing compared to other backends? I believe the most important feature is read cd functionality which hasn't been implemented in libburn yet :)

Someone please correct me if my understanding of the way Brasero works is flawed.

Cheers,

M.

On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 14:56, Fabian Greffrath <greffrath leat rub de> wrote:

Dear Brasero devs,

sorry if this has been discussed in detail before, but I could not find any more useful information about this topic.

Are there plans to make libburn the default backend for Brasero? If yes, please tell me when this is expected and what is still missing. This would make a great new feature for GNOME 3.0, wouldn't it? ;)

Cheers,
Fabian

--
Dipl.-Phys. Fabian Greffrath

Ruhr-Universität Bochum
Lehrstuhl für Energieanlagen und Energieprozesstechnik (LEAT)
Universitätsstr. 150, IB 3/134
D-44780 Bochum

Telefon: +49 (0)234 / 32-26334
Fax:     +49 (0)234 / 32-14227
E-Mail:  greffrath leat ruhr-uni-bochum de
_______________________________________________
Brasero-list mailing list
Brasero-list gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/brasero-list