Re: [anjuta-devel] Why still keep Scintilla support?

[Sébastien Granjoux <seb sfo free fr>]

Hi,


On 26/08/2014 15:22, Sébastien Wilmet wrote:
> Yes, Builder by Christian Hergert:
> http://www.hergert.me/blog/2014/07/29/gnome-builder.html
>
> If an IDE component crashes, it can be restarted with D-Bus. The
> architecture seems similar with Anjuta. But there won't be plugins in
> Builder, at least at the beginning.

Yes, I haven't checked the code but I imagine that Anjuta's plugins are 
replaced by components.


> The code is simpler without plugins. You don't need an API, you can do
> all the code refactoring that you want.

I think the API is replaced by the description of exchanged D-Bus messages.


> Plugins developed by external
> developers are often less well tested with new versions of the
> application. The features can be directly implemented in the
> application.

Currently, almost all plugins are developed within Anjuta project so the 
difference is quite minimal.


Regards,

Sébastien