Hi!
PyGObject uses GObject Introspection to generate bindings at runtime while PyGtk generates bindings statically, so using PyGObject greatly simplifies building bindings.Sure, on the other hand, PyGObject is probably much slower and has more limitations.
Not really. Actually PyGObject supports much more libraries and details of the C API. I haven't seen any benchmarks but I also doubt that it is any slower as the python people made it the default (and only available) python binding for GNOME3. Regards, Johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part