Re: Proposal for ConfigureRequest handling



On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 02:17:27PM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 06:27:53AM -0500, Ben Jansens wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 24, 2002 at 10:40:25PM +0200, Marko Macek wrote:
> > > Ben Jansens wrote:
> > > 
> > > >erm, obviously we're miscommunicating somewhere. Openbox 2.0.0
> > > >respects the window's gravity on a ConfigureRequest, so a request at
> > > >0,0 puts the frame at 0,0 instead of the client, with the frame off
> > > >the screen.
> > > 
> > > Jup, that works. What doesn't work is resize-only ConfigureRequest for
> > > South+/EastGravity.
> > 
> > Just commited a fix for this. It will show up in 2.0.1. Thanks for
> > pointing that out.
> > 
> > So what does everyone think of the offset property?
> 
> It works only for NW gravity.  I think it would be a better idea
> to set a special property on the WM frame that indicates that it's
> the top level window.  The client can then look up the decoration
> size itself.

What guarantee do you have that the top-level window will be the size
of all encompassing decorations?

Ben
-- 
I am damn unsatisfied to be killed in this way.

Attachment: pgpZWCbXgkSVL.pgp
Description: PGP signature



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]