Re: Proposal for ConfigureRequest handling
- From: Dominik Vogt <dominik vogt gmx de>
- To: wm-spec-list gnome org
- Cc: Marko Macek <Marko Macek gmx net>
- Subject: Re: Proposal for ConfigureRequest handling
- Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2002 14:17:27 +0200
On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 06:27:53AM -0500, Ben Jansens wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2002 at 10:40:25PM +0200, Marko Macek wrote:
> > Ben Jansens wrote:
> >
> > >erm, obviously we're miscommunicating somewhere. Openbox 2.0.0
> > >respects the window's gravity on a ConfigureRequest, so a request at
> > >0,0 puts the frame at 0,0 instead of the client, with the frame off
> > >the screen.
> >
> > Jup, that works. What doesn't work is resize-only ConfigureRequest for
> > South+/EastGravity.
>
> Just commited a fix for this. It will show up in 2.0.1. Thanks for
> pointing that out.
>
> So what does everyone think of the offset property?
It works only for NW gravity. I think it would be a better idea
to set a special property on the WM frame that indicates that it's
the top level window. The client can then look up the decoration
size itself.
> Anyone know any
> other way to provide for an accurate placement including decorations?
Bye
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Dominik Vogt, dominik vogt gmx de
Reply-To: dominik vogt gmx de
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]