Re: Proposal for ConfigureRequest handling

On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 11:05:33PM +0200, Marko Macek wrote:
> Ben Jansens wrote:
> >On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 06:31:31PM +0200, Marko Macek wrote:
> >
> >>Dominik Vogt wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>The window manager is allowed to change the client window's
> >>>gravity, but no other applications may do so.
> >>
> >>It is?
> >>
> >>The client window's actual window gravity is specified in the XWMHints. 
> >>Where does it say that WM should use another gravity? The gravity on the 
> >>window obviously doesn't matter for this purpose.
> >>
> >>Of course, after testing only metacity and icewm (1.2.0) do it like 
> >>this. No other WM seems to support the window gravity as specified by 
> >>current wm-spec (I tried fvwm2, fluxbox, wmaker using the test program 
> >>posted here recently by Matthias Clasen)
> I have now upgraded my fvwm and resizing gravity works fine, but the 
> repositioning on NorthWestGravity is broken, as expected.
> >Openbox and blackbox do as well. I beleive sawfish does too. In fact,
> >iirc E and WMaker were the only ones we tried that didnt.
> Which version of openbox? 2.0.0 doesn't do it for me.

erm, obviously we're miscommunicating somewhere. Openbox 2.0.0
respects the window's gravity on a ConfigureRequest, so a request at
0,0 puts the frame at 0,0 instead of the client, with the frame off
the screen.

> I am upgrading the others for more tests.

I am damn unsatisfied to be killed in this way.

Attachment: pgpDxGNbjIFM9.pgp
Description: PGP signature

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]