Re: ICCCM breakage, IconicState, and desktops

On Sun, Dec 02, 2001 at 12:17:17PM -0500, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> Olivier Chapuis <olivier chapuis free fr> writes: 
> > I do not understand this solution. There is a really simple solution
> > (_NET_WM_MINIMIZED) to be consistent with the ICCCM. So, why
> > the wm-spec take the decision to violate it?
> >
> Well, that is my opinion also, but Sasha and Raster strongly
> disagreed, so we went with the ICCCM modification. The most important
> thing is that we do document what we've decided; if window managers
> don't agree on this point then pagers can't work correctly.

I read the mails of Sasha, I see also one mail of Raster on
the subject but it does not seem to me that this mail was
against _NET_WM_MINIMIZED. But maybe you get some private
mails on the subject. Raster?

Regards, Olivier

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]