Re: ICCCM breakage, IconicState, and desktops
- From: Olivier Chapuis <olivier chapuis free fr>
- To: wm-spec-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: ICCCM breakage, IconicState, and desktops
- Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2001 11:46:40 +0100
On Sun, Dec 02, 2001 at 02:19:12AM -0500, Havoc Pennington wrote:
>
> Sasha Vasko <sasha aftercode net> writes:
> > One ought to use virtual roots when implementing virtual desktops.
> >
>
> There are advantages to doing them via unmaps instead, IMO. So the WM
> spec definitely should not prohibit that approach.
>
> However we need to make explicit that the current spec allows this
> ICCCM violation, and that we have equated IconicState with "minimized"
> instead of "unmapped" and broken the invariants given in the ICCCM. I
> think we decided to make that explicit last time the topic came up,
> but I never put the patch into the document.
>
I do not understand this solution. There is a really simple solution
(_NET_WM_MINIMIZED) to be consistent with the ICCCM. So, why
the wm-spec take the decision to violate it?
Regards, Olivier
BTW where is the wm-spec CVS (:pserver:anonymous ???/??? I imagine the
module name is wm-spec).
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]