Re: [Vala] Removal of Mono



Ah, ok, I'm sorry for my impulsive response. I may have implied a
thing or two from following parts:

Subject: Removal of Mono
-- What the hell?

"It may be prudent to keep a weather eye open for the removal of mono on
the horizon."
-- As with the subject, this implies you want Mono removed.

"Sure, we don't want Vala spoiling by mono"
-- This, on the other hand, implies you consider Mono as something bad
that would spoil Vala.

"I'm not advocating the vala be able to compile C# code"
-- You're suggesting it. Otherwise you would mention that possibility at all.

Along with that, Vala and C# are different languages with different
principles and different target audiences. People wanting to switch
just for the purpose of not using Mono logically must be either stupid
or mono-haters.

Anyway. With the kind of things those anti-mono guys are writing
lately, I may have switched into an "anti-anti-mono" mode a bit too
early. Sorry about that. Just shows how these people spread hate among
peaceful guys like me. :)

Regarding your original post, there is really nothing to "keep a
weather eye open" related to Mono. You can just look forward to a
stable version and see it mature.

Dne 26. červen 2009 13:48 Sam Liddicott <sam liddicott com> napsal(a):
* Jiří Zárevúcky wrote, On 26/06/09 12:28:
Ah, another one of the anti-mono guys. Sigh...


Ah, another one of those guys who sees anti-mono guys everywhere.

Let me tell you, that from the sole principle of how Vala works, it
will never be possible to convert C# code in a mechanistic fashion.


Of course it will, it just won't compile or run.

You could maybe try creating some sort of automatic converter, which
wouldn't work anyway, as it would result in a lot of bugs, inferior
performance and (in better case) memory leaks.

You could try this too. I think I'll wait to see if there is a need.

Just the possibility of
"Vala being able to compile C# code" is so ridiculous I wonder who
came up with that.


I've never heard the idea suggested, and I didn't suggest it. It seems
you are the one who came up with it.

I wish you had read my message. In it I acknowledged some of these points.

I think you read the message you thought I had written.

But there will be some language features of C# which are not within the
vala philosphy or language direction but which might be supported and
thus making some migration easier; I merely suggest keeping an open eye
for these.

I don't expect any mechanistically converted C# to "compile and work"
with Vala, but it could be valid vala, with the parts that need
re-working annotated.

Anyway. Why hating Mono?

I don't hate mono (although I prefer Vala). I wrote a nice mono
application for controlling my USB experimenter board.

Mono is a great software platform and people
will use it no matter what MS-haters say about it.

Good for them. (And me, I'm one of them).

Get over it people.


Get over what? I don't understand your attitude in this response!

I merely advocated keeping a weather eye open in case we could help a
migration from mono. I don't advocate that we actually DO anything.

Sam

2009/6/26 Sam Liddicott <sam liddicott com>:

It may be prudent to keep a weather eye open for the removal of mono on
the horizon.

Vala is excellent, and I prefer it to mono; however it may become
pricelessly important that mono code can be converted to vala in a
mechanistic fashion.
I'm talking about language features, not library dependencies and linkages.

Sure, we don't want Vala spoiling by mono, and I'm not advocating the
vala be able to compile C# code; I'm not advocating anything specific...

..just to keep a weather eye open...

[http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/keep_a_weather_eye_open]

Sam
_______________________________________________
Vala-list mailing list
Vala-list gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list







[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]