Re: keys.c hack?




On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 18:58:10 +0100, Christopher Roy Bratusek wrote:
> Well what I've got in mind is something like:
> 
> ;; exec true when NumLock is OFF
> KP_Left '(system "true &")
> 
> ;; exec true when NumLock is ON
> N-KP_Left '(system "true &")

Yes, it'll be great. (Thanks for explanation I omitted :) I meant that
someone else may like NumLock gets ignored, so that both KP_Left and
NumLock-KP_Left are treated as "KP_Left".  (This is the current
Sawfish.) 

Option to switch between these two is easy, and I'll do it if NumLock
support is done.

Cheers,
Teika (Teika kazura)



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]