Re: keys.c hack?

[Christopher Roy Bratusek <zanghar freenet de>]

Am Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:22:29 +0900 (JST)
schrieb Teika Kazura <teika lavabit com>:

> 
> 
> On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 18:58:10 +0100, Christopher Roy Bratusek wrote:
> > Well what I've got in mind is something like:
> > 
> > ;; exec true when NumLock is OFF
> > KP_Left '(system "true &")
> > 
> > ;; exec true when NumLock is ON
> > N-KP_Left '(system "true &")
> 
> Yes, it'll be great. (Thanks for explanation I omitted :) I meant that
> someone else may like NumLock gets ignored, so that both KP_Left and
> NumLock-KP_Left are treated as "KP_Left".  (This is the current
> Sawfish.) 

X-KP_Left ? or NI-KP_Left ?

> Option to switch between these two is easy, and I'll do it if NumLock
> support is done.
> 
> Cheers,
> Teika (Teika kazura)
>