Re: keys.c hack?



Well what I've got in mind is something like:

;; exec true when NumLock is OFF
KP_Left '(system "true &")

;; exec true when NumLock is ON
N-KP_Left '(system "true &")

Deadline is 3.0, which I expect to take 12 months, so there's time until
December 2010

Regards,
Chris

Am Montag, den 26.10.2009, 21:15 +0900 schrieb Teika Kazura:
> On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 20:37:39 +0200, Christopher Roy Bratusek wrote:
> > I'll try to change keys.[ch] to "my" needs for 3.0. 
> 
> If you mean NumLock, then please make it optional. Others may want
> Sawfish to ignore NumLock.
> 
> Well, you can concentrate on the core hack, and I can do option part.
> (But if the deadline is so close I'll beg to postpone it.)
> 
> Thanks beforehand.
> Teika (Teika kazura)
> 
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]