Re: [NEWS] XF86 checks are back / fixed several build issues
- From: Timo Korvola <Timo Korvola iki fi>
- To: sawfish-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [NEWS] XF86 checks are back / fixed several build issues
- Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 22:05:06 +0200
Christopher Roy Bratusek <zanghar freenet de> writes:
> Am Dienstag, den 03.02.2009, 10:33 -0700 schrieb Michal Jaegermann:
>> And that may get you if it will turn out that this particular
>> install-sh is not liked by autotools versions you happen to be
>> running.
I don't think such dislike is very likely to emerge as the
requirements for install-sh should be rather static: it is just a
stand-in for /usr/bin/install. Including install-sh in SVN should be
safe enough.
> autoreconf does _not_ create install-sh on my system
Hm, indeed it does not seem to. Probably because we are not using
automake.
> and automake -a -c does exit with error code 1, since there's no
> Makefile.am.
So it does. It creates install-sh nevertheless.
--
Timo Korvola <URL:http://www.iki.fi/tkorvola>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]