Am Dienstag, den 03.02.2009, 10:33 -0700 schrieb Michal Jaegermann: > On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 04:49:56PM +0100, Christopher Roy Bratusek wrote: > > Am Dienstag, den 03.02.2009, 09:59 +0200 schrieb Timo Korvola: > > > it would probably be better to use autoreconf instead of trying to sort > > > out the hairy details of invoking all the different Autotools commands > > > in correct order and with correct parameters. > > > > > I see. I just added install-sh to svn of librep/rep-gtk/sawfish. > > And that may get you if it will turn out that this particular > install-sh is not liked by autotools versions you happen to be > running. I suspect that what Timo suggests has better chances of > survival. Although autoreconf run will likely refresh install-sh > anyway. > > Michal > autoreconf does _not_ create install-sh on my system and automake -a -c does exit with error code 1, since there's no Makefile.am. ... so what else should I do than shipping install-sh ... I could check if /usr/share/libtool/config/install-sh exists and copy it into $srcdir, if there isn't one ... Chris
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil