On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 12:59:37PM +0000, era eriksson wrote: > Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz <rodrigo <at> nul-unu.com> writes: > > A [debug] package for etch would have to be unofficial anyways, since the > > distro is frozen. I can set it up kind-of-easily. I'll work on doing > > that over the week. > > > > Making an 'official' debug version available in testing/unstable would > > be a little harder, since I'd have to find a way to make it coexist > > with the regular package. What does the list think? Would it have > > enough users to make it worth the effort? > I think unofficial should probably be sufficient, although if you're > prepared to maintain it, having a pointer in the README.Debian of > the official package would be extremely nice. Good idea. > Luis, can you build debug packages for at least the top few > architectures? I'll see what I can do. In the worst case, I can use an emulator to build them. Since that'd be sloooooow, I'd only build the really top ones. Which are those? i386, amd64 are certain. sparc? ia64? others?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature