Re: Debian debug sawfish packages [Was: Sawfish/Gnome/Xinerama?dropping windows]

On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 12:59:37PM +0000, era eriksson wrote:
> Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz <rodrigo <at>> writes:
> > A [debug] package for etch would have to be unofficial anyways, since the
> > distro is frozen. I can set it up kind-of-easily. I'll work on doing
> > that over the week.
> > 
> > Making an 'official' debug version available in testing/unstable would
> > be a little harder, since I'd have to find a way to make it coexist
> > with the regular package. What does the list think? Would it have
> > enough users to make it worth the effort?

> I think unofficial should probably be sufficient, although if you're
> prepared to maintain it, having a pointer in the README.Debian of
> the official package would be extremely nice.

Good idea.
> Luis, can you build debug packages for at least the top few
> architectures?

I'll see what I can do. In the worst case, I can use an emulator to
build them. Since that'd be sloooooow, I'd only build the really top
ones. Which are those? i386, amd64 are certain. sparc? ia64? others?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]