Re: [sabayon] UI change? Manditory vs. Default
- From: Scott Balneaves <sbalneav legalaid mb ca>
- To: sabayon-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [sabayon] UI change? Manditory vs. Default
- Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 23:09:02 -0600
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 11:08:45AM -0600, Scott Balneaves wrote:
> Hello all,
> I've elected https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356478 to stand in for
> the entire "everything turns into defaults and not mandatory where applied"
heh, so, just out of curiosity, I added a background image to a profile, and
then went into changes, and changed it from Gold (Mandatory) to
Look what shows up in my zipfile?
0 2009-12-17 22:03 .gconf.xml.defaults/desktop/gnome/accessibility/%gconf.xml
0 2009-12-17 22:03 .gconf.xml.defaults/desktop/gnome/%gconf.xml
0 2009-12-17 22:03 .gconf.xml.defaults/desktop/gnome/applications/%gconf.xml
263 2009-12-17 22:05 .gconf.xml.defaults/desktop/gnome/applications/window_manager/%gconf.xml
0 2009-12-17 22:05 .gconf.xml.mandatory/desktop/%gconf.xml
180 2009-12-17 22:05 .gconf.xml.mandatory/desktop/gnome/background/%gconf.xml
0 2009-12-17 22:05 .gconf.xml.mandatory/desktop/gnome/%gconf.xml
Ahhh, the old "Binary Inversion Trick", eh?
Or, maybe we've had it wrong all along, and Gold *ISN'T* mandatory!
Either way, the CODE works, but the UI's less than clear.
Muahahaha, I'll fix *that* up.
Scott L. Balneaves | When one burns one's bridges,
Systems Department | what a very nice fire it makes.
Legal Aid Manitoba | -- Dylan Thomas
] [Thread Prev