On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 19:44 +0200, Oliver Lemke wrote: > Can you verify that a completely new checkout of the merge branch still > contains the void param? I just tried on a remote machine updating an > existing copy and a checking out a new copy directly from my public > archive and in both cases rb_sourcelist_new expects RBShell as a > parameter. No idea what is going wrong here. Strange. After removing my copy, purging my revision cache and grabbing a new copy it still has the void parameter. The mirror that I'm getting it from is http://arch.core-dump.info/archive. That's correct isn't it? Cheers, James "Doc" Livingston -- "Thus the great moments of one's life occur between installing the new version of xscreensaver and creating a mailing list." -- Frossie, in the scary.devil.monastery
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part