Re: moduleset review

[Allan Day <allanpday gmail com>]

 Javier Jardón <jjardon gnome org> wrote:
...
> > https://wiki.gnome.org/AllanDay/Modulesets
>
> Thanks for working on this!
>
> Only wanted to point that gnome-suites-core-deps contain the dependencies for
> core, not only non-GNOME dependencies (GTK+ and GLib are there for example).
> Maybe we can be more strict and move things over, and leave -core-deps
> for external deps only (that we need to build, for dependencies we
> expect are available in the system we use -sysdeps)

That might be best - good to have a clear criteria for which modules
go into that moduleset.

...

> > I wonder if it would be clearer to change "Core Utilities" to "Core
> > Apps", or even to split them out into a new moduleset
> > (gnome-core-apps).
>
> I'd be ok with both changes
> I think is clearer ro have a matching between meta modules and the
> file, as we have with meta-gnome-apps-tested and gnome-apps now.
> So we can have:
>
> gnome-core to build meta-gnome-core
> gnome-core-apps to build a new renamed meta-gnome-core-apps
> gnome-apps to build meta-gnome-apps-tested
>
> Then gnome-core-deps and gnome-sysdeps for external deps

Sounds good.

> > Also, while we're on the subject, the word "suites"
> > in "gnome-suites-core" and "gnome-suites-core-deps" always confused
> > the hell out of me. It makes it sound like each moduleset contains
> > different suites that you can install...
>
> same here, I guess we can rename to gnome-core and gnome-core-deps if
> the rest agree

Great.

Thanks!

Allan