Re: Evolution/MAPI

Am Montag, den 17.11.2008, 16:03 +0100 schrieb Vincent Untz:
> Le lundi 17 novembre 2008, à 20:25 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan a écrit :
> > > We prefer tarballs and dislike depending on svn revisions.
> > 
> > Sure, but the last time we were based on libmapi-0.7's particular
> > version. We surely would depend on libmapi-0.8, but some time later, as
> > this new version brings in API changes which we aren't interested much
> > to change atm. It changes the architecture a bit around supporting
> > multiple Exchange connections. So I might depend on 0.8 may be some time
> > later, but for now, I would stick to a particular version. Even libmapi
> > for that matter depends on a particular samba4 revision than some
> > tarball. 
> So you want to use something which is between libmapi-0.7 and
> libmapi-0.8? I think that's something we'd like to avoid.

I want to avoid that too. It probably makes it harder for distributions
that might need to ship different versions of the same library if other
software also depends on libmapi.
How old is the current "particular version"/svn revision?

How much work/code changes would it require to depend on 0.8?
Is this feasible for the 2.26 API freeze at January 12th?

I'd really like to find a suitable solution for 2.26 because missing
support for Exchange 2007 is quite a sales blocker currently.

 mailto:ak-47 gmx net | failed  |

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]