Re: [Planner Dev] Patch to add an abstraction layer between Planner and GConf
- From: Mikael Hallendal <micke imendio com>
- To: Planner Project Manager - Development List <planner-dev lists imendio com>
- Subject: Re: [Planner Dev] Patch to add an abstraction layer between Planner and GConf
- Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 08:53:53 +0200
On tis, 2004-08-10 at 07:19 +0300, Jani tiainen wrote:
> Jon Wilkins wrote:
> > On Mon, 2004-08-09 at 13:46, Richard Hult wrote:
> >>2. implement planner-conf-win32.c in terms of registry (or other
> > Could there be a build (or run-time) option to read a simple ini instead
> > of registry - this could be really useful... messing with registry
> > entries can be a real PITA compared to good-ol' ini's!
> Actually, registry is more analoguous to GConf than INI's. INI's are
> deprecated method in win32 environment.
I don't think it would make a huge different (other from the one
implementing the backend). We don't need anything more than .ini files
since we'll shortcut the notifications in the backend. Ie. when you
update a key in planner a notification, if needed, should be emitted
from the win32 backend.
Imendio HB, http://www.imendio.com/
] [Thread Prev