Re: [Planner Dev] Patch to add an abstraction layer between Planner and GConf

From: Jani tiainen <redetin luukku com>
To: Planner Project Manager - Development List <planner-dev lists imendio com>
Subject: Re: [Planner Dev] Patch to add an abstraction layer between Planner and GConf
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 07:19:33 +0300

Jon Wilkins wrote:

On Mon, 2004-08-09 at 13:46, Richard Hult wrote:

2. implement planner-conf-win32.c in terms of registry (or other
method?)


Could there be a build (or run-time) option to read a simple ini instead
of registry - this could be really useful... messing with registry
entries can be a real PITA compared to good-ol' ini's!

Actually, registry is more analoguous to GConf than INI's. INI's aredeprecated method in win32 environment.


But if you're willing to write INI backend, go ahead.

--

Jani Tiainen

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Planner Dev] Patch to add an abstraction layer between Planner and GConf
  - From: Mikael Hallendal

References:
- [Planner Dev] Patch to add an abstraction layer between Planner and GConf
  - From: Mikael Hallendal
- Re: [Planner Dev] Patch to add an abstraction layer between Planner and GConf
  - From: lincoln phipps openmutual net
- Re: [Planner Dev] Patch to add an abstraction layer between Planner and GConf
  - From: Jani tiainen
- Re: [Planner Dev] Patch to add an abstraction layer between Planner and GConf
  - From: Mikael Hallendal
- Re: [Planner Dev] Patch to add an abstraction layer between Planner and GConf
  - From: Richard Hult
- Re: [Planner Dev] Patch to add an abstraction layer between Planner and GConf
  - From: Jon Wilkins

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]