On Fri, 2017-03-31 at 08:10 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017, at 08:03 PM, Philip Withnall wrote:I'm not concerned about the cost of downloading the summary file from each remote. I am concerned about the cost of advertising a lot of refs in DNS-SD records,I'm saying we only advertise the presence of a single repo, *not* each available ref. A client would *try* to fetch refs it was interested in from the available repos. Does that make sense?
Yes, that makes sense, and is the conclusion I came to in my previous e-mail. What are your thoughts on the DNS-SD advert containing the common prefix of the refs in the repo, rather than a UUID or GPG key? Philip
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part