Re: [orca-list] [solved] Re: Arch+orca stopped talking to me

[José Vilmar Estácio de Souza <vilmar informal com br>]

Hi.
I can send PKGBUILDS to compile atk, at-spi2-core and at-spi2-atk 
2.7.91. They were used in my arch box without problems.


On 03/12/2013 10:20 AM, Kyle wrote:
> I received a PKGBUILD for orca 3.7.91 off list. Looks like it actually
> pulls down the release tarball and builds it. I'm told that it requires
> downgrading automake to 1.12. I installed the automake-1.12 package from
> AUR, and it builds correctly. This PKGBUILD appears to be based on the
> abs version of Orca's PKGBUILD for 3.6.1, but with some extra sha256
> sums and the python2 dependencies replaced with python, which in Arch
> represents python 3. I can send you the PKGBUILD off list if you like.
> Since this builds for a release rather than from git, it may be possible
> to upload this or a cleaned up version to AUR as orca-latest,
> orca-testing or similar.
>
> For some time now, the AUR package orca-git has failed to build. Seems
> it depends on a package called python-wnck, which is no longer present
> in AUR. If this dependency problem can be fixed, it will once again be
> possible to build and install orca-git from AUR. It should be possible
> now with a simple edit of the PKGBUILD, but packer, the AUR helper I
> use, keeps trying to download python-wnck before I can even edit the
> PKGBUILD for orca-git. My next step is to attempt to download the AUR
> tarball and build it manually with the python-wnck dependency removed,
> and modifying the rest of the dependencies to match the orca 3.7.91
> PKGBUILD I have if necessary.
>
> As for the atk, at-spi2-core and at-spi2-atk packages, I actually
> received links to prebuilt binary packages for these rather than
> PKGBUILD files. It's possible these are in AUR as well, but either they
> are not there, or they fail to build. I just installed the binary
> packages, I didn't try building them from AUR. These packages are
> optional at this time, however, as Orca 3.7.91 works fine with the
> current official packages. There have been some bugfixes though that may
> make it worth upgrading to these releases.
> ~Kyle
> http://kyle.tk/

--
{}S José Vilmar Estácio de Souza