Re: [orca-list] Is anyone using Orca with Emacspeak? And does speech-dispatcher support hardware synths?

[covici ccs covici com]

Hardware synthesizers are always more responsive than software
synthesizers.  I have never been able to get speakup, for instance, to
do indexing with software synthesizers.  So we have two reasons for
hardware synthesizers.

Joanmarie Diggs <joanied gnome org> wrote:

> Hey again Tomas, all.
>
> > I'd rather put it this way: We don't want to put OUR effort into developing output 
> > modules for hardware synthesizers
>
> Having pondered this some more.... I think I was asking the wrong
> question before. The right question perhaps is instead: What would it
> take to get speech-dispatcher to such a high degree of awesomeness that
> no one would even consider using a hardware synthesizer? Is it work that
> needs to be done in speech-dispatcher itself, or in espeak, or someplace
> else? And is anyone doing it?
>
> Take care.
> --joanie
>
> _______________________________________________
> orca-list mailing list
> orca-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
> Visit http://live.gnome.org/Orca for more information on Orca.
> The manual is at http://library.gnome.org/users/gnome-access-guide/nightly/ats-2.html
> The FAQ is at http://live.gnome.org/Orca/FrequentlyAskedQuestions
> Netiquette Guidelines are at http://live.gnome.org/Orca/FrequentlyAskedQuestions/NetiquetteGuidelines
> Log bugs and feature requests at http://bugzilla.gnome.org
> Find out how to help at http://live.gnome.org/Orca/HowCanIHelp

-- 
Your life is like a penny.  You're going to lose it.  The question is:
How do
you spend it?

         John Covici
         covici ccs covici com