Re: [orca-list] Draft Proposed Two-Year Roadmap
- From: Mike Gorse <mgorse alum wpi edu>
- To: orca-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [orca-list] Draft Proposed Two-Year Roadmap
- Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 14:36:19 -0400 (EDT)
I don't think that it's possible to decide whether to partly rewrite Orca
in C/C++ until some performance analysis is done, since we need to know
whether or not it would significantly speed things up. There are a lot of
factors which can affect performance aside from the programming language.
Ie; do some of Orca's algorithms take a long time to run? If so, is this
because it, for instance, repeatedly calls atk code that winds up doing
some complex calculation on certain toolkits / in certain cases? Are
there changes to at-spi's ipc or api that could be made to simplify the
work that Orca needs to do? So this debate about whether to use C++ could
be mostly moot in the end, or, if some of the significant performance
issues are caused by things other than what I mentioned and we have an
estimate as to how much using C/C++ could improve performance, then that
will inform the discussion.
-Mike G-
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]