[orca-list] Efficiency/speed of interpreted code (Re: Punctuation, capital letters, exchange of characters and strings, generally error in the design of Orca)
- From: Willie Walker <William Walker Sun COM>
- To: Halim Sahin <halim sahin t-online de>
- Cc: orca-list gnome org
- Subject: [orca-list] Efficiency/speed of interpreted code (Re: Punctuation, capital letters, exchange of characters and strings, generally error in the design of Orca)
- Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 07:37:27 -0400
I'm not sure where the performance of Python fits in comparison to
native C, but I've had first hand personal experience with Java:
http://research.sun.com/techrep/2002/abstract-114.html
Will
On Apr 8, 2008, at 6:39 AM, Halim Sahin wrote:
Hi,
On Di, Apr 08, 2008 at 08:02:24 +1000, Jason White wrote:
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 11:38:51AM +0200, Halim Sahin wrote:
In fact you mean such a accessibilitty infrastructure is not
performance critical??????
With modern processors, yes. My high-end desktop machine will be
typical of
what people have in a few years time, as quad-core CPUs become the
norm.
Orca and Gnome hardly increase the load average on my machine (two
dual-core
Intel Xeon CPUs, 4gb RAM, two SAS drives).
Ok we need now quadcores to have fast accessibility software? Sory that
is not what most of the users want.
I have a pentium 4 2400 Mhz with 2 gb ram.
Under windows my jaws runs very fast and I don't need to buy a new
machine.
BTW. I am working under linux since 9 years and have windows as
dualboot
option. Most time linux is running (console).
Even on my single-core laptop with 1gb of RAM, it's still fast; and
as I
pointed out earlier, at some point it will be possible to compile it
to
machine code anyway.
Without static type checking there is no need for this!
The disaadvantages can not be solved this way.
What about orca's performance in general?
There were some performance improvements last months but comparing
orca
to ohther screenreaders showws the problem.
It depends on whether the problem is actually in Orca or elsewhere,
and what
the performance issue turns out to be. Have you submitted a bug
report?
Is this a bug?
It works only slow!!!!
And when you search the list I wrote about such problemsin the past.
BR.
Halim
_______________________________________________
Orca-list mailing list
Orca-list gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
Visit http://live.gnome.org/Orca for more information on Orca
- References:
- Re: [orca-list] Punctuation, capital letters, exchange of characters and strings, generally error in the design of Orca
- Re: [orca-list] Punctuation, capital letters, exchange of characters and strings, generally error in the design of Orca
- Re: [orca-list] Punctuation, capital letters, exchange of characters and strings, generally error in the design of Orca
- Re: [orca-list] Punctuation, capital letters, exchange of characters and strings, generally error in the design of Orca
- Re: [orca-list] Punctuation, capital letters, exchange of characters and strings, generally error in the design of Orca
- Re: [orca-list] Punctuation, capital letters, exchange of characters and strings, generally error in the design of Orca
- Re: [orca-list] Punctuation, capital letters, exchange of characters and strings, generally error in the design of Orca
- Re: [orca-list] Punctuation, capital letters, exchange of characters and strings, generally error in the design of Orca
- Re: [orca-list] Punctuation, capital letters, exchange of characters and strings, generally error in the design of Orca
- Re: [orca-list] Punctuation, capital letters, exchange of characters and strings, generally error in the design of Orca
- Re: [orca-list] Punctuation, capital letters, exchange of characters and strings, generally error in the design of Orca
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]