Re: Homenet
- From: Xen <xen dds nl>
- To: networkmanager-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Homenet
- Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 16:37:43 +0100
Using an ULA (as long as it is stable) is really the same as ignoring
the first 64 bits. Any number that never changes can be ignored in a
computation, or ceases being a variable in that sense (quite literally).
Op 22-3-2016 om 16:17 schreef Xen:
Meaning, he wants his router to generate an ULA and use that for all
hostname resolution within the network. That also seems to imply that
any addressing from the outside (the mobile device moving across
borders) is not going to work when it uses a hostname.
That would imply that addressing in the home should not even USE the
first 64 bit of the address field. That in turn would imply that the
network should only have one (external) prefix, or that addressing
from the outside using that prefix should be uniquely resolvable at
all times, which means that if different prefixes ARE used, the
internal host part should still be unique.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]