Re: Request for ergonomy feature

[Michael Trunner <michael trunner de>]

Am Mittwoch, den 02.05.2007, 17:39 -0400 schrieb Dan Williams:
> On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 23:00 +0200, Michael Trunner wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I had a very similar idea. If I have choose a network it shouldn't
> > switch to another when the my goes off. Because everyday when my own
> > network is to faraway nm switch to the network of my neighbour. In this
> > case nm shouldn't  search for other networks. I think a checkbox "search
> > for networks" would be nice.
> 
> If you don't want to associate with your neighbors network, remove it
> from GConf.  You connected to it once upon a time, which is why NM is
> trying now.  Granted, there should be a nice way to remove cached
> networks, but having a checkbox for scanning is not the solution.
> 

Hmm okay, but I have a similar problem on my University. There is one
for the complete campus (VPN) and one for special buildings with eap
which I prefer. But sometimes it switch like at home. Deleting the gconf
entry is okay for the problem with my neighbours. But not for my problem
one the university, because when I leave the building (so there is no
eap conncetion) then I'm using the campus WLAN and the gconf entry is
back.
Maybe some one have a good idea for this problem.

Michael



> Dan
> 
> > Bye
> > 
> > Michael
> > 
> > Am Mittwoch, den 02.05.2007, 19:12 +0300 schrieb Joan Moreau:
> > > The point is not to do it by oneself or by the pc, but one may click 
> > > several time on the icon to see the status of the discovery which 
> > > trigger a new search and that does not end , while having to click once 
> > > on a button let people be able to see the current list of network 
> > > without "risking" to trigger a new search.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Christopher Aillon wrote:
> > > > Greg Oliver wrote:
> > > >   
> > > >> On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 09:08 +0200, Soren Hansen wrote:
> > > >>     
> > > >>> Could one of you perhaps explain to me why you want to do something
> > > >>> manually that network-manager does for you automatically? I don't quite
> > > >>> get it.
> > > >>>       
> > > >> Honestly, so my LED does not blink repeatedly
> > > >>     
> > > >
> > > > You'll have others blinking anyway.  Hard disk, etc.
> > > >
> > > >   
> > > >> - as well as go back to a
> > > >> previous request to have wired/wireless active simultaneously (I know
> > > >> thats coming).  In that situation, that would be most pleasant.  My
> > > >> radio would not be scanning constantly when I do not need it and I could
> > > >> scan when I want them both on.
> > > >>     
> > > >
> > > > And if your wired ever dies out?  Or if you need to move for some reason 
> > > > and need to unplug?  Do you want NetworkManager to just sit there for 
> > > > you to realize what happened, then click the applet, then click perform 
> > > > scan, wait for a few seconds, figure out which Network, and then connect 
> > > > you to wireless?
> > > >
> > > > Personally, I'd rather my music stream keep on playing.  The whole point 
> > > > of NetworkManager is to do the work for you.  People that don't want it 
> > > > to do the work still have iwconfig/iwlist.
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > NetworkManager-list mailing list
> > > > NetworkManager-list gnome org
> > > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
> > > >   
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > NetworkManager-list mailing list
> > > NetworkManager-list gnome org
> > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
> > > 
> 
> 
-- 
Wenn das eigene Wohlbefinden von der vereinigten Dummheit fast aller
Anderer geprägt ist, lebt man meistens in einer Demokratie.