Re: Singe DES encryption should be enabled



On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 01:12 -0500, Jon Nettleton wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 12:18 -0500, Jon Nettleton wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 10:53 -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2007-02-21 at 21:34 +0100, Olaf Telsh�r wrote:
> > > > We should enable single DES encryption mode. In this
> > > > case, vpnc must be called using the --enable-1des
> > > > flag.
> > > 
> > > Are there really cases where 1des is still being used?  I'd rather that
> > > it be something you have to manually enable rather than accepting 1des
> > > by default.
> > > 
> > 
> > I think we really want to expose as many of the command line options in
> > the gui that we sanely can.  Make sure all our defaults are reasonable,
> > but allow people to tweak if necessary.
> > 
> > I think following the logic of your previous comments and changing the
> > vpn interface such that required goes back to being a normal panel.  We
> > add a small advanced options button on the bottom left of the dialog.
> > This will open a modal window organized by tabs for all the different
> > options that are supported.
> > 
> > I will try and mock up some screenshots when I have some free time.
> > 
> 
> <clip>
> 
> So I fired up glade and threw together some code to take the vpn dialogs
> through another iteration.  I have some screenshots that can definitely
> use some critiquing.  
> 
> http://www.hekanetworks.com/~jnettlet/NetworkManager/nm-openvpn-newest-main.jpg
> 
> http://www.hekanetworks.com/~jnettlet/NetworkManager/nm-openvpn-newest-advanced-network.jpg
> 
> http://www.hekanetworks.com/~jnettlet/NetworkManager/nm-openvpn-newest-advanced-encryption.jpg
> 
> 
> I already have the working code for these changes.  Once opinions are
> weighed I can spit out a patch.

I like it.

Thanks,
Dan





[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]