Re: named or not?
- From: Tomislav Vujec <tvujec redhat com>
- To: networkmanager-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: named or not?
- Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 18:39:16 +0200
On Tue, 2005-10-18 at 14:41 -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
> No, NM no longer spawns named directly at any point. If named is
> already running (we check whether the DBUS service that named provides
> is active or not) then NM will use it. If the service is not running,
> NM falls back to writing /etc/resolv.conf. NM no longer launches named
> at all.
I've noticed that patched bind also comes with the service file:
/usr/share/dbus-1/services/named.service
As it is now, D-BUS uses similar service file for dhcdbd to start the
service if it is not already running. Why is starting named a
requirement, while starting dhcdbd happens automatically?
--
Tomislav Vujec Manager, Client Development
Red Hat GmbH Otto-Hahn-Stra� 20 Germany 85609 M�-Dornach
Tel +49 89 205071 212 Fax +49 89 205071 111 Cell. +49 172 623 1214
Skype/AIM/Yahoo/IRC: tvujec ICQ: 4508361 http://www.redhat.com/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]