Re: [Nemiver-list] Re: Nemiver 0.3 Roadmap

[Rémi Cardona <remi2402 domain hid>]

dodji Seketeli a écrit :
> Hey,
>
> To me, the breakpoints enabling/disabling features are more important
> than session management stuff.
> More generally, I would like to focus more on adding  more "pure"
> debugging features, unless users say otherwise. By pure debugging
> features, I mean things like a disassembler (to show the dissambled
> code when no source code is available), an interface to set
> watchpoints, a command interpreter etc ...
>
> We really need these features if we want people to stop using DDD on 
> GNOME :-)

I can only agree with this idea. I've been using Nemiver to debug 
Audacious and some of my apps, and it's been really helpful.

One thing that could be useful though (but I can only imagine the amount 
of work required for it) would be to split the lower pane so that users 
could show more "stuff" down there. I think having both the frame/stack 
and the variables tab next to each other would be a nice addition.

Also, when opening a source file, the selected tab stays on the same 
source file. I think it'd be better to select the source I just opened.

I'll finish this with a question : how comes sometimes some symbols are 
missing, or show up later when I run a program? The function parameters 
don't always appear either. (But that's a gdb issue, as Nemiver behaves 
exactly like gdb) Are there ways to force all symbols to show up? (I 
have several test cases for that, it can be annoying to "guess" some values)

Anyway, thanks for the 0.2.0 release, it's already a pleasure to use 
Nemiver.

Rémi