Re: [libxml++] patch to allow building without glibmm
- From: Chris Coleman <cqc Cs Nott AC UK>
- To: Vadim Zeitlin <vadz users sourceforge net>
- Cc: libxmlplusplus-general lists sourceforge net
- Subject: Re: [libxml++] patch to allow building without glibmm
- Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 14:23:19 +0100
I will cerainly make use of this.
I've had issues getting libxml++'s dependancies to build for my
projects, and have been seriously considering the use of xmlwrap instead
due to the inconvenience of having glibmm as a dependancy.
MC> > Also, I wanted to have a clean way to build libxml++ without glibmm
MC> > and so I've created the attached patch to do it.
MC> Sounds OK, though I don't think many people will really need it.
One point doesn't make a convincing statistics, but I'm currently
participating in work on several different projects each of which had
initially chosen to use xmlwrapp instead of libxml++ just because of this
dependency. I'd like to use libxml++ instead but there is just no way I'm
going to make my project depend on GTK+ just because of this (especially as
there is no real need to use Glib::ustring here apparently)
This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment
may still contain software viruses, which could damage your computer system:
you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the
University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.
] [Thread Prev