Re: 'notify' signal handler

On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 22:47, Quikee <quikee gmail com> wrote:
> Hi,
> I have now fixed the problem with timing the updates and firing the
> notify signal only if time between updates is greater than 0.1 sec. It
> does not include a final update when map is idle but from testing the
> solution I think it should be good enough.
> I have removed the last merge request and added a new merge request
> with this solution. The solution can be found at (1).
> (1):
> Regards, Tomaž

Hi Tomaž,

thanks for your work! Originally I also had the solution you
implemented first in my mind (plus it could be extended by taking into
account the zoom level) but maybe the time-based approach is really
better. I'll test it and if it behaves well, I'll apply it.



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]