Re: [HIG] Mini-Guidelines style
- From: Gregory Merchan <merchan phys lsu edu>
- To: colin z robertson <c z robertson ndirect co uk>
- Cc: hig gnome org
- Subject: Re: [HIG] Mini-Guidelines style
- Date: 11 Aug 2001 02:18:15 -0500
Catching up on email, just wanted to voice my accord.
On 10 Aug 2001 16:50:48 +0100, colin z robertson wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 07:19:24AM -0700, Adam Elman wrote:
> > >> Topics under these subsections should be marked as <h3>. No headers
> > >> below <h3> should be present.
> > >
> > >Why not?
> >
> > Just to keep the structure of the documents a little simpler. I'd
> > reconsider this if there is objection.
>
> It just seems to me that if it can be divided up to a finer degree
> then we should allow it to be done in a structured way. I actually
> suspect it will be possible to divide up this sort of thing quite
> finely. Maybe it's just my writing style but I've found myself going
> down to h4.
>
>
> > Again, I don't want to get too bogged down in semantics, and to do
> > this _right_ we would need to specify it even clearer than this. I'd
> > rather get this written and published quickly in HTML than in a
> > transformable way.
> >
> > The only structure I think it's important to preserve is structural,
> > and that I see us doing through the use of headings. That will allow
> > us to build navigation and a style via CSS. But I'm open to
> > discussion on this. :)
>
> Fair enough.
>
I've not worked with docbook before but I have no objection to learning
it. The glossary I have at the moment is HTML with a little CSS, but
I'll look have a look at the GDP help and see if I can sed it over to
SGML. I've also considered making use of the DICT format which should
make the glossaries readily available. (It might be a good idea to look
at making dict an integral part of some apps, but more later.)
>
> > >Do we want to be PNG purists here?
> >
> > I don't particularly, but I don't care a whole lot either way. If
> > there is an official GNOME policy on this I think we should stick to
> > it. I note that the images on the GNOME home page are PNG's, so
> > that's probably a good way to go.
>
> The official GNOME policy is no gifs (because of the patents).
>
> colin
I favor that we keep to this policy for the same reason we have it.
--
Greg Merchan
(auspex)
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]