On Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 07:19:24AM -0700, Adam Elman wrote: > >> Topics under these subsections should be marked as <h3>. No headers > >> below <h3> should be present. > > > >Why not? > > Just to keep the structure of the documents a little simpler. I'd > reconsider this if there is objection. It just seems to me that if it can be divided up to a finer degree then we should allow it to be done in a structured way. I actually suspect it will be possible to divide up this sort of thing quite finely. Maybe it's just my writing style but I've found myself going down to h4. > Again, I don't want to get too bogged down in semantics, and to do > this _right_ we would need to specify it even clearer than this. I'd > rather get this written and published quickly in HTML than in a > transformable way. > > The only structure I think it's important to preserve is structural, > and that I see us doing through the use of headings. That will allow > us to build navigation and a style via CSS. But I'm open to > discussion on this. :) Fair enough. > >Do we want to be PNG purists here? > > I don't particularly, but I don't care a whole lot either way. If > there is an official GNOME policy on this I think we should stick to > it. I note that the images on the GNOME home page are PNG's, so > that's probably a good way to go. The official GNOME policy is no gifs (because of the patents). colin _____________________________ ____ rtnl http://rational.cjb.net c z robertson ndirect co uk icq 13294163
Attachment:
pgp4j46YUQmdg.pgp
Description: PGP signature