Re: [gupnp] GUPnP 0.14.1 (stable) & GUPnP 0.15.0 (unstable)

["Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)" <zeenix gmail com>]

On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson gmail com> wrote:
>>  I agree but this was unavoidable and I did give you a chance to
>> raise your voice about this:
>
> Well I must have missed that mail (I get around 500 messages a day so
> some do slip) but I have raised my voice about this in the past and my
> opinion

  Just your opinion that "we should avoid bumping requirements in
stable releases" doesn't exactly help as we already agree with that.
There was an issue and I needed some way to solve it. Since you (or
anyone) didn't say anything, I went with the only sane solution I
could think of. Besides, I didn't imagine fedora would have any issues
with this since I was under the impression that fedora is supposed to
be closely following gnome (releases).

-- 
Regards,

Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
FSF member#5124
--
To unsubscribe send a mail to gupnp+unsubscribe\@o-hand.com