Re: [gupnp] GUPnP 0.14.1 (stable) & GUPnP 0.15.0 (unstable)

["Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)" <zeenix gmail com>]

Hi Peter,

On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 8:30 PM, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson gmail com> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 6:21 PM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) <zeenix gmail com> wrote:
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 6:20 PM, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson gmail com> wrote:
>>
>>> It seems we have a new release of gupnp-av in both the 0.6 and 0.7
>>> branches that's not been announced yet.
>>
>>   You didn't get the mail about that? I just checked and it seems I
>> did send the announcement mail to this mailing list.
>>
>>> 0.7 release built fine on
>>> rawhide but it seems 0.6.3 has a regression over previous 0.6.1 stable
>>> releases in the detection of gobject-introspection. Everything is
>>> identical to when I built  0.6.1.
>>>
>>> Build log is:
>>> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2638884&name=build.log
>>
>>  Sorry but you could help me by pointing out the exact error. The one
>> that I could find is this one and it doesn't tell me enough to figure
>> out whats going wrong:
>
> Its not detecting gobject-introspection in configure and is hence not
> enabling it. The lack of the file at the end is just the end result of
> that. I'm not sure if the version requirements of go-i have changed
> (which they shouldn't in a minor release) or something else because
> the configure script doesn't say why its not but I checked and the
> go-i-devel package is installed.

  Oh, you are going directly from 0.6.1 to 0.6.2. Which is
understandable since I had forgotten to announce 0.6.2 (so sorry for
that). :( Anywhere, here is the log of 0.6.2 that answers your
question:

Another micro release that bumps the g-i requirement to 0.9.5.

We either have the option of staying with the older gobject-introspection and
keeping disto packagers happy or fix our .gir build against latest (and
unstable) gobject-introspection that happens to be part of GNOME 2.32. After
looking at possible alternatives, talking to a few people and keeping in mind
that we mainly stabalized for GNOME 2.32, we've decided to go for the latter
choice.

All contributors to this release:

Vincent Untz <vuntz gnome org>

-- 
Regards,

Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
FSF member#5124
--
To unsubscribe send a mail to gupnp+unsubscribe\@o-hand.com