Re: why not usring + ustring = ustring like QT?

[Giuseppe Penone <giuspen gmail com>]

Hi,

On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 8:47 PM, fr33domlover <fr33domlover mailoo org> wrote:

Hello,

On ב', 2014-01-27 at 17:24 +0100, Giuseppe Penone wrote:
> Hi, I wonder why we cannot add the support for operator + like in QString,
> it is so
> incredible useful.

Murray answered that.

>
> One more thing, after a request I spent time to create the windows gtkmm
> binaries based on official 3.6.4 bundle and provided a link to my
> successful work but then I received no feedback, did I just waste my time?
> Well if the (only) effort to create gtkmm binaries is ignored, even if
> coming from a donkey, I don't see much future for gtkmm.

I do think some people here use gtkmm on Window$, judging by the mail
sent to the various mailing lists regarding Window$ builds.

But I mus say this has nothing to do with the future of gtkmm. Many
people use gtkmm on GNU/Linux and they can use it a lot even if the
usage on Window$ dies. For example, I use gtkmm for all my desktop GUIs
written in C++, and I'm not planning to stop using it, but I don't use
Window$ at all so I'm not interested in the Window$ build.

I'm not a windows fan too but I think that being able to use the same code/libraries

on different operative systems is an incredible advantage.

 

Anyway, I hope you get the feedback you expect. And thanks for writing
CherryTree, by the way! I used to use it a lot.

I'm always so happy to hear somebody using it, thank you :)

You see also in cherrytree it is very very important that it is
available also on windows to have the generated document readable also there.

 

>
> Regards,
> Giuseppe.

-- fr33

> _______________________________________________
> gtkmm-list mailing list
> gtkmm-list gnome org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list