Re: why not usring + ustring = ustring like QT?
- From: fr33domlover <fr33domlover mailoo org>
- To: Giuseppe Penone <giuspen gmail com>
- Cc: Gtkmm list <gtkmm-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: why not usring + ustring = ustring like QT?
- Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 21:47:37 +0200
Hello,
On ב', 2014-01-27 at 17:24 +0100, Giuseppe Penone wrote:
Hi, I wonder why we cannot add the support for operator + like in QString,
it is so
incredible useful.
Murray answered that.
One more thing, after a request I spent time to create the windows gtkmm
binaries based on official 3.6.4 bundle and provided a link to my
successful work but then I received no feedback, did I just waste my time?
Well if the (only) effort to create gtkmm binaries is ignored, even if
coming from a donkey, I don't see much future for gtkmm.
I do think some people here use gtkmm on Window$, judging by the mail
sent to the various mailing lists regarding Window$ builds.
But I mus say this has nothing to do with the future of gtkmm. Many
people use gtkmm on GNU/Linux and they can use it a lot even if the
usage on Window$ dies. For example, I use gtkmm for all my desktop GUIs
written in C++, and I'm not planning to stop using it, but I don't use
Window$ at all so I'm not interested in the Window$ build.
Anyway, I hope you get the feedback you expect. And thanks for writing
CherryTree, by the way! I used to use it a lot.
Regards,
Giuseppe.
-- fr33
_______________________________________________
gtkmm-list mailing list
gtkmm-list gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]