Re: Building Glibmm 2.14.2 against Glib 2.16.1

On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 8:48 PM, Paul Davis <paul linuxaudiosystems com> wrote:
>  On Mon, 2008-03-24 at 20:42 -0500, Jonathon Jongsma wrote:
>  > Yes, this is unfortunate and was caused by glib maintainers moving
>  > some functions to a different header.  We complained that this was a
>  > form of API breakage, but they said that the only API that they
>  > guarantee is that you should always just include <glib.h>.
>  thats it the most bogus reply i've ever heard from anyone involved in
>  gnome. its so bogus its egregiously outrageous. and yet we're stuck with
>  it. sigh.

Yeah, I don't understand it either, but here it is:


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]