Re: Building Glibmm 2.14.2 against Glib 2.16.1

On Mon, 2008-03-24 at 20:42 -0500, Jonathon Jongsma wrote:
> Yes, this is unfortunate and was caused by glib maintainers moving
> some functions to a different header.  We complained that this was a
> form of API breakage, but they said that the only API that they
> guarantee is that you should always just include <glib.h>. 

thats it the most bogus reply i've ever heard from anyone involved in
gnome. its so bogus its egregiously outrageous. and yet we're stuck with
it. sigh.

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]